Left--right Transfer for $C4^{\ast}$-Rings Beyond the Regular Case
Chandrasekhar Gokavarapu (Department of Mathematics, Government College (Autonomous), Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India)

TL;DR
This paper investigates conditions under which left--right symmetry of the strongly C4*-ring condition holds beyond regularity, introducing transfer mechanisms, obstruction patterns, and permanence properties within a Morita-type framework.
Contribution
It develops new transfer principles for C4*-rings beyond regularity, identifies structural obstructions, and establishes permanence results, advancing the classification of left--right symmetry.
Findings
Established sufficient conditions for left--right transfer beyond regularity.
Identified structural obstructions preventing transfer.
Formulated transfer principles that persist under matrix and corner operations.
Abstract
The first structural fact is that regularity is sufficient for left--right symmetry of the strongly \(C4^{\ast}\) condition. It is not necessary for the definition itself and is too strong for classification. The problem is therefore to determine which weaker hypotheses still force right \(C4^{\ast}\)-type conditions to pass to the left side, and which obstructions prevent such transfer. We study right \(C4^{\ast}\)-rings, strongly right \(C4^{\ast}\)-rings, and right semi-weak-CS \(C4^{\ast}\)-rings under hypotheses strictly weaker than regularity. The method does not repeat the regular decomposition argument. Instead, it isolates a transfer mechanism based on orthogonal decomposition, corner control, and summand-square-free separation. This yields sufficient conditions for left--right transfer beyond the regular case and also identifies necessary obstruction patterns. In particular,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
