Selecting optimal unrestricted Hartree-Fock trial wavefunctions for phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo: Accuracy and limitations in modeling three iron-sulfur clusters
Don Danilov, Brad Ganoe, Leon Otis, Zhi Gong, Zixiang Lu, James Shee

TL;DR
This study evaluates how the choice of unrestricted Hartree-Fock trial wavefunctions affects the accuracy of phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo in modeling complex iron-sulfur clusters, highlighting the importance of chemical and symmetry considerations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that chemical properties and symmetries should guide trial wavefunction selection in ph-AFQMC, and reveals the limitations of UHF trials in strongly correlated systems.
Findings
Accurate ground-state energies can be obtained despite suboptimal overlaps.
Sampling bias can lead to artificially negative energies in ph-AFQMC.
Symmetry and chemical property considerations are crucial for trial wavefunction choice.
Abstract
Phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) has emerged as a promising electronic structure method for correlated electronic systems. However, the quality of its predictions depends critically on the choice of trial wavefunction, and it is not obvious how to make an optimal choice especially for strongly correlated states of large systems. Mean-field wavefunctions are compelling trial wavefunction candidates as they map directly to chemical concepts and can be obtained with cost. Yet in the strongly correlated regime one faces a symmetry dilemma and the existence of multiple nearly-degenerate solutions. In this work we investigate active space models of [2Fe-2S], mixed-valent [4Fe-4S], and [4Fe-4S] and explore the sensitivity of ph-AFQMC to the choice of unrestricted Hartree-Fock trial wavefunction. We find that chemical properties and physical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
