Empirical Bernstein Confidence Intervals for Kernel Smoothers: A Safe and Sharp Way to Exhaust Assumed Smoothness
Zihao Yuan, Sven Klaa{\ss}en

TL;DR
This paper introduces empirical Bernstein confidence intervals for kernel smoothers that effectively control bias and stochastic fluctuations, providing accurate coverage and optimal width without normalization issues.
Contribution
It develops a new calibration method using empirical Bernstein tail control that improves inference for kernel smoothers by avoiding bias amplification from normalization.
Findings
Intervals attain nominal coverage up to a small remainder
Widths shrink at the minimax rate $n^{-S/(2S+1)}$
Method applies to univariate density and regression functions
Abstract
Using normal approximation (NA) to construct confidence intervals for kernel smoothers faces a fundamental challenge: the normalization that produces a limiting distribution also magnifies smoothing bias, so that a small estimation bias may become a non-negligible inferential bias. Robust bias correction (RBC) and bias-aware inference (BA) address this difficulty through different bias-control strategies. This paper takes a different route by replacing the normal-approximation calibration engine with empirical Bernstein tail control. The resulting confidence intervals control stochastic fluctuations on the original estimation scale, so that deterministic smoothing bias enters the radius as an estimation-scale approximation error rather than as a normalized inferential bias. We develop this idea for pointwise inference on univariate density and regression functions. The proposed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
