\textit{Euclid} preparation. Baryon acoustic oscillations extraction techniques: comparison and optimisation
Euclid Collaboration: E. Sarpa, A. Veropalumbo, M. Bonici, M. K\"archer, M. Crocce, E. Sefusatti, E. Maragliano, E. Branchini, C. Oliveri, G. Gambardella, B. Camacho Quevedo, C. Moretti, P. Monaco, J. Bautista, M. Viel, W. J. Percival, S. Nadathur, A. Pezzotta, A. Eggemeier

TL;DR
This paper validates and optimizes the Euclid BAO analysis pipeline, demonstrating its accuracy, efficiency, and robustness in extracting cosmological parameters from mock data.
Contribution
It introduces methodological advances including an emulator-based model evaluator, a semi-analytical covariance estimator, and compares two BAO reconstruction methods, ensuring scalable and reliable analysis.
Findings
Both reconstruction methods produce unbiased BAO measurements across redshifts.
Reconstruction improves the figure of merit for key parameters by a factor of three.
BAO-only constraints reach approximately 10% on and 3% on H_0 r_s.
Abstract
We present the first end-to-end validation of the Euclid baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) analysis pipeline, encompassing density-field reconstruction, two-point correlation function measurement, and cosmological-parameter inference. Using eight Euclid-like mock catalogues from each of four Flagship I snapshots, designed to reproduce the expected statistical properties of the first Euclid data release (DR1), we assess the two standard BAO reconstruction methods based on the Zel'dovich approximation, RecSym and RecIso, across . The pipeline introduces several methodological advances: an emulator-based model evaluator (Bora.jl) combined with a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampler (NUTS), achieving more than a 500-fold speed-up relative to standard Markov chain Monte Carlo, and a semi-analytical covariance estimator (BeXiCov+WinCov) that enables robust error estimates from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
