Coordination as an Architectural Layer for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
Maksym Nechepurenko, Pavel Shuvalov

TL;DR
This paper proposes treating coordination as a separate architectural layer in LLM-based multi-agent systems, enabling better predictability and analysis of failure modes through a controlled experimental setup.
Contribution
It introduces an architectural approach to coordination in multi-agent LLM systems, with a case study on prediction markets demonstrating its effectiveness.
Findings
Configurations leave distinguishable Murphy signatures even with similar scores.
Three configurations dominate the Pareto frontier in cost-quality trade-offs.
Bootstrap analysis separates consensus alignment from other configurations.
Abstract
Multi-agent LLM systems fail in production at rates between 41% and 87%, mostly due to coordination defects rather than base-model capability. Existing responses split between cataloguing failure modes empirically and shipping declarative orchestration frameworks as engineering tools; neither delivers a principled mapping from coordination configuration to predictable failure-mode signature. We argue that coordination should be treated as a configurable architectural layer, separable from agent logic and from information access, enabling architectural reasoning rather than only engineering productivity. We instantiate this with an information-controlled design on prediction markets: a single LLM, fixed tools, fixed per-call output cap, and fixed prompt template across five reference coordination configurations, with total compute per question treated as an endogenous architectural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
