ArkenstoneBH. A model for high-specific energy black hole feedback in cosmological simulations
James M. Sullivan, Greg L. Bryan, Matthew C. Smith, Jake S. Bennett, Drummond B. Fielding, Bryan A. Terrazas, Sophie Koudmani, Rachel S. Somerville, Michaela Hirschmann

TL;DR
The paper introduces ArkenstoneBH, a new subgrid model for simulating high-specific-energy black hole feedback in galaxy evolution, demonstrating its effectiveness in suppressing star formation in isolated galaxy simulations.
Contribution
It extends the Arkenstone framework to model black hole feedback, focusing on the hot, high-energy phase of outflows in coarse resolution simulations.
Findings
Arkenstone BH captures high-energy outflows interacting weakly with cold gas.
The model suppresses star formation by counteracting gas inflow from the circumgalactic medium.
Demonstrates the framework's ability in isolated galaxy simulations.
Abstract
AGN feedback is a key piece of galaxy evolution but is difficult to model due to its high specific energies, multiphase nature, and limited simulation resolutions. Arkenstone is a subgrid framework for representing multiphase flows in coarse resolution simulations that has been used to model stellar feedback driven galactic winds. It ensures the correct treatment of high specific energy feedback that would otherwise be challenging to model accurately in Lagrangian simulations. We introduce the new Arkenstone BH model, which extends the Arkenstone framework to model black hole feedback. We focus on describing the first piece of this framework, which follows the hot, high specific energy phase of these outflows. The second piece, which treats their multiphase structure with a scheme for modeling unresolved cold clouds, will be implemented and described in a later paper. We present…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
