Gordian distance and clasper surgery for links
Anthony Bosman, Christopher W. Davis, Taylor Martin, Katherine Vance

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between Gordian distance, clasper surgery, and $C_k$-equivalence in links, revealing limitations of finite type invariants in bounding unlinking numbers and establishing quadratic bounds.
Contribution
It extends known results from knots to links regarding $C_k$-equivalence and crossing changes, providing new bounds and exact calculations for unlinking complexities.
Findings
Any link with zero linking number can be reduced to $C_k$-trivial in at most $n^2$ crossing changes.
Constructed links show crossing change distance to $C_k$-trivial links grows quadratically with the number of components.
Finite type invariants like Milnor's invariants have limited power to bound unlinking numbers.
Abstract
In 2000, Habiro introduced the notion of -equivalence of knots and links. This geometric filtration is closely connected to finite type invariants, a class of invariants including Milnor's invariants. Shortly thereafter, Ohyama, Taniyama, and Yamada proved that -equivalence, and by extension finite type invariants, say very little about the unknotting number by showing that any knot is at most one crossing change away from being -trivial for any . The same is not true for links, since the pairwise linking number gives a lower bound on unlinking and is an invariant of -equivalence. We prove that, aside from the linking number, the result of Ohyama, Taniyama, and Yamada extends to links: any -component link with linking number zero can be reduced to a -trivial link in at most crossing changes. As a consequence, Milnor's invariants carry…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
