Synergy Area with FDR-controlled Evaluation (SAFE) to robustly assess safety profile in clinical trials
Tianyu Zhan, Yabing Mai, Yihua Gu, Thao Doan, Xun Chen

TL;DR
The paper introduces SAFE, a two-layer framework that robustly assesses drug safety in clinical trials by evaluating clinically meaningful areas and controlling false discovery rates, ensuring reliable safety conclusions.
Contribution
It proposes a novel SAFE framework that emphasizes substantial evidence and error rate control for safety assessment, improving robustness over existing methods.
Findings
SAFE controls error rates within and across areas at the nominal level.
SAFE effectively screens out extreme data and reaches solid safety conclusions.
Application to real data demonstrates SAFE's practical utility and robustness.
Abstract
Safety assessment plays a fundamental role in developing a new drug via clinical trials for ethical considerations. Due to complexity, manual review is typically conducted on the totality of data to draw safety conclusions. There are some existing quantitative methods to facilitate or tailor further medical review, with a controlled error rate and integration of clinical knowledge. In addition to those two key aspects, we emphasize the importance of relying on substantial evidence to draw robust conclusions on safety. Motivated by these three important properties, we propose a two-layer Synergy Area with FDR-controlled Evaluation (SAFE) structural framework to robustly assess the safety profile in clinical trials. In the first layer of SAFE, we investigate each clinically meaningful Synergy Area (SA) based on compelling evidence. In the next layer, the false discovery rate (FDR) is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
