An explainable hypothesis-driven approach to Drug-Induced Liver Injury with HADES
Maciej Wisniewski, Bartosz Topolski, Pawel Dabrowski-Tumanski, Dariusz Plewczynski, Tomasz Jetka

TL;DR
This paper introduces HADES, an explainable system for predicting drug-induced liver injury by generating mechanistic hypotheses, outperforming existing models and providing transparent reasoning.
Contribution
The paper presents HADES, a novel agentic system that combines mechanistic insights with predictions, and introduces the DILER Benchmark dataset for hypothesis-driven DILI assessment.
Findings
HADES achieves ROC-AUC of 0.68 on the Test Set.
HADES outperforms DILI-Predictor in binary classification.
HADES attains a Hypothesis Alignment Fuzzy Jaccard Index of 0.16.
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a leading cause of late-stage clinical trial attrition. However, existing computational predictors primarily rely on binary classification, a framing that limits generalization and yields no mechanistic insight to guide translational decisions. We argue that DILI prediction is better posed as an explainable hypothesis-generation problem. To support this shift, we introduce the DILER Benchmark, a dataset that extends beyond binary labels by augmenting a curated set of molecules with mechanistic hepatotoxicity hypotheses derived from biomedical literature. We further present HADES, an agentic system designed to generate transparent and auditable reasoning traces. By combining molecular-level predictions, metabolite decomposition, structural understanding, and toxicity pathway evidence, HADES mechanistically assesses DILI risk. Evaluated on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
