Synthetic Users, Real Differences: an Evaluation Framework for User Simulation in Multi-Turn Conversations
Yu Lu Liu, Hyokun Yun, Tanya Roosta, Ziang Xiao

TL;DR
This paper introduces realsim, a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing the realism of user simulations in multi-turn chatbot dialogues, highlighting the differences from real user interactions.
Contribution
It presents a new distributional evaluation framework and a curated dataset to rigorously compare real and simulated dialogues across multiple dimensions.
Findings
Simulated users struggle to replicate communication frictions present in real dialogues.
Evaluation reveals variability in simulation quality across different chatbot domains.
Simulations may lead to overly optimistic assessments of chatbot performance.
Abstract
There is growing interest in exploring user simulation as an alternative to gathering and scoring real user-chatbot interactions for AI chatbot evaluation. For this purpose, it is important to ensure the realism of the simulation, i.e., the extent to which simulated dialogues reflect real dialogues users have with chatbots. Most existing methods evaluating simulation realism produce coarse quality signal and remain solely at the level of individual dialogues. To support more rigorous evaluation in this area, we propose realsim, an evaluation framework that enables practitioners to take a distributional view of real vs. simulated dialogues along 8 dimensions, covering attributes related to the communicative functions of the interaction, user states, and the surface form of user messages. We then instantiate the framework with a curated dataset of 1K multi-turn task-focused real…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
