Evaluating Different Modalities of Behavioral Approach Tests for Spider Phobia in Virtual Reality
Florian Grensing, Vanessa Schmuecker, Anne Hildebrand, Tim Klucken, Maria Maleshkova

TL;DR
This study evaluates a virtual reality version of behavioral approach tests for spider phobia, demonstrating VR's potential for controlled, consistent assessment of anxiety and avoidance behaviors.
Contribution
It introduces and assesses four VR-based BATs, comparing them to real-world tests, and explores their effectiveness and physiological correlates in measuring spider phobia.
Findings
VR BATs perform within established presence norms.
Different modalities influence subjective impressions.
Correlations found between presence and physiological signals.
Abstract
Behavioral approach tests are a common means of assessing specific phobias. In these tests, participants move towards an anxiety-inducing stimulus as close as they are willing to, with the final distance indicating the severity of the anxiety. In this work, we aim to evaluate a virtual reality implementation of the BAT. For this purpose, four different BATs were designed, consisting of two approach methods, both replicated in vivo and in virtuo. Evaluation of these BATs is done by using a standardised presence questionnaire, application-specific questions, as well as the physiological reactions of the participants. The study focuses on the fear of spiders and uses a real and virtual spider as an anxiety-inducing stimulus. Our results show that the developed VR BAT perform within established presence norms, while the different modalities influenced participants' subjective impressions.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
