Bondi and Novikov-Thorne accretion in regular black holes and Simpson-Visser spacetimes
Serena Gambino

TL;DR
This paper compares accretion models around regular black holes and Simpson-Visser spacetimes, highlighting the Bondi model's sensitivity to spacetime geometry and the effects of regularisation parameters.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of accretion models on regular black holes and introduces how parameters like $\, ext{ extbackslash}ell$ and $Q$ influence accretion dynamics.
Findings
Bondi model is more sensitive to spacetime geometry and equation of state.
Increasing $\, ext{ extbackslash}ell$ shifts critical points inward and outward.
Charged Simpson-Visser extension's effects are less significant than $\, ext{ extbackslash}ell$.
Abstract
We compare the Bondi spherical accretion model and the Novikov-Thorne thin disc formalism around regular black holes and Simpson-Visser spacetimes, using several equations of state for the accreting fluids. The Bondi model is significantly more sensitive to spacetime geometry and the equation of state, making it more effective at distinguishing between regular and classical solutions. For the Simpson-Visser solutions, however, increasing the regularisation parameter, , shifts critical point positions both inward and outward. However, the charged Simpson-Visser extension, modeled by the charge , does not produce an effect comparable to that of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
