Empirical Evaluation of Deadline-Resolved Information Leakage on Documented Polymarket Insider Cases
Maksym Nechepurenko

TL;DR
This paper empirically evaluates the deadline-Information Leakage Score extension for prediction-market contracts, demonstrating its ability to distinguish signals in documented insider trading cases, with detailed analysis on Polymarket data.
Contribution
It introduces and empirically tests the deadline-ILS extension, showing its effectiveness in analyzing deadline-resolved insider trading prediction markets.
Findings
Hazard-rate estimation fits well for military-geopolitics markets.
The ILS-dl distinguishes signal from proxy artefact in a major Polymarket contract.
Cross-market wallet analysis identifies active wallets in relevant markets.
Abstract
This paper reports an end-to-end empirical evaluation of the deadline-Information Leakage Score (ILS-dl) extension introduced in the companion methodology paper. The deadline-ILS extends the original ILS to deadline-resolved prediction-market contracts, the dominant structural form of publicly documented insider trading on Polymarket. We anchor the evaluation in the 2026 U.S.-Iran conflict cluster of the ForesightFlow Insider Cases (FFIC) inventory, the largest documented deadline cluster. The evaluation has four parts: per-category exponential-hazard estimation, a single-case ILS-dl computation, cross-market wallet analysis, and methodological refinements. Hazard-rate estimation produces an adequate exponential fit for military-geopolitics markets (KS p = 0.426, half-life 2.9 days, n = 18) and a preliminary fit for corporate-disclosure markets (n = 5). The regulatory-decision…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
