Practical Boundary Degeneracy and Reverse-Martingale Limits in Sequential Binary Models
Yuan-chin Ivan Chang

TL;DR
This paper unifies boundary degeneracy phenomena in sequential binary models under a reverse-martingale framework, proposing a new stopping rule that considers boundary closeness, uncertainty, and stability to better identify genuine limiting degeneracy.
Contribution
It introduces a unified reverse-martingale approach and a stopping rule requiring multiple conditions, improving the detection of boundary degeneracy in sequential binary data analysis.
Findings
Boundary closeness alone is unreliable as a stopping signal.
Stability condition distinguishes transient from genuine degeneracy.
Numerical studies validate the effectiveness of the proposed stopping rule.
Abstract
A run of all failures, a run of all successes, or complete separation in a logistic regression each tempts the analyst to declare a probability of exactly zero or one. The central message of this paper is that all three phenomena share a common structure: finite sequential data justify practical boundary statements of the form or , but not exact boundary probabilities. The paper's contribution is to unify these three settings under a single reverse-martingale framework and to derive a stopping rule, , that requires three conditions simultaneously -- boundary closeness , uncertainty width , and trajectory stability -- rather than boundary closeness alone. The reverse-martingale view recasts boundary degeneracy as a property of the limiting conditional law…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
