Constraints on Ultralight Scalar and Dark Photon Dark Matter from PPTA-DR3 and EPTA-DR2
Xiao-Song Hu, Siyuan Chen, Kuo Liu, Xingjiang Zhu, Shi-Yi Zhao, Wu Jiang, John Antoniadis, N. D. Ramesh Bhat, Amodio Carleo, Shi Dai, Valentina Di Marco, Huanchen Hu, Wenhua Ling, Yang Liu, Saurav Mishra, Christopher J Russell, Ryan M. Shannon, Clemente Smarra, Jingbo Wang

TL;DR
This study uses pulsar timing array data to search for ultralight scalar and dark photon dark matter, setting new upper limits on their properties and improving constraints over previous analyses.
Contribution
First Bayesian search for ULDM signals in PTA data incorporating pulsar distances, providing new constraints on scalar ULDM and dark photon dark matter.
Findings
No significant ULDM detection; upper limits set at 95% confidence.
PPTA-DR3 constraints improve over PPTA-DR2 for most masses.
First constraints on dark photon dark matter from EPTA data.
Abstract
The cold dark matter model successfully describes the Universe on large scales, yet faces challenges at sub-galactic scales. Ultralight dark matter (ULDM), with particle masses around , offers a promising solution to these small-scale issues. Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTAs), designed to detect nanohertz gravitational waves, can also provide a sensitive probe for ULDM signals. In this work, we perform a Bayesian search for ULDM using PTA data sets, focusing on two types of signals: the oscillatory gravitational potential from scalar ULDM and the fifth-force interaction mediated by dark photon dark matter (DPDM). We incorporate pulsar distances in the analysis to better model the ULDM density. No statistically significant evidence for ULDM has been found, therefore we place 95% confidence-level upper limits on the relevant parameters. For scalar ULDM, our analysis does…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
