Is Complexity the Problem? Testing Random Choice with Heterogeneity
Shuhua Si

TL;DR
This paper develops a framework to distinguish whether observed stochasticity in economic choices is due to comparison difficulty or preference heterogeneity, demonstrating that heterogeneity alone can explain some apparent complexity.
Contribution
It introduces a revealed preference method that accounts for heterogeneity when testing for comparison difficulty in aggregate choice data.
Findings
Heterogeneity can explain violations of stochastic transitivity in aggregate data.
The proposed test can differentiate between heterogeneity and comparison difficulty.
Empirical applications show heterogeneity alone accounts for observed choice inconsistencies.
Abstract
Economic choices are often stochastic: the same person may make a different choice when facing the same alternatives repeatedly. Standard models assume that the degree of randomness reflects the size of utility differences, but choice inconsistencies could also reflect difficulty comparing alternatives. Recent studies estimate such comparison difficulty (or "complexity") by fitting functional forms to aggregate choice data under a representative agent assumption. However, aggregate data could violate standard models of random choice simply because of heterogeneity in preferences, even in the absence of variation in comparison difficulty. This paper develops a revealed preference framework, collective rationalizability, that tests for variation in comparison difficulty from aggregate data while explicitly accounting for heterogeneity. The framework characterizes whether violations of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
