
TL;DR
This paper proves that while all EML-expressible numbers are computable, certain well-known non-computable numbers like Chaitin's Omega are inexpressible within the Exp-Minus-Log system, establishing a formal inexpressibility result.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the Exp-Minus-Log system cannot express Chaitin's Omega, providing a formal inexpressibility theorem for this computational framework.
Findings
All EML-expressible numbers are computable.
Chaitin's Omega is inexpressible in EML.
The paper establishes a formal boundary for EML's expressiveness.
Abstract
Odrzywo\l{}ek defined a system Exp-Minus-Log (EML) that reduces all elementary functions over complex numbers down to a constant `', and a single two place function . This paper shows that in this system, equivalent to Chow's EL numbers, every EML-expressible number is computable. We go on to prove that the canonical example of a non-computable real, Chaitin's , is inexpressible in EML. This gives a formal inexpressibility theorem for this system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
