Witness Set: A Visibility Problem in $NP\cap XP$
Satyabrata Jana, Debabrata Pal, Bodhayan Roy, Sasanka Roy

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Witness Set problem, showing it lies in NP and XP for simple polygons, and provides algorithms and complexity results contrasting it with the Art Gallery problem.
Contribution
It proves Witness Set is in NP and XP for simple polygons, offers a combinatorial discretization approach, and establishes NP-completeness for the discrete variant.
Findings
Witness Set lies in NP and XP for simple polygons.
A finite discretization of size n^{f(k)} exists for Witness Set.
Discrete Witness Set is NP-complete for polygons with holes.
Abstract
We study the Witness Set problem, a natural dual to the classical Art Gallery problem. In the Witness Set problem, we are given a polygon and an integer as input, and the objective is to determine whether has a witness set of size at least . A point set in is called a witness set if every point in is visible from at most one point in . For simple polygons, we show that Witness Set lies in both and . This stands in sharp contrast to its dual, the Art Gallery problem, which was recently shown to be -complete by Abrahamsen et al. and is therefore neither in nor admits a polynomial-size discretization unless . In contrast, we prove that Witness Set for simple polygons admits a finite discretization of size for some function . For comparison, even for simple polygons, Efrat and Har-Peled…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
