SCALE-LoRA: Auditing Post-Retrieval LoRA Composition with Residual Merging and View Reliability

TL;DR

SCALE-LoRA introduces a framework for auditing and reliably composing open-pool LoRA adapters, improving reuse and output consistency through residual merging and multi-view disagreement analysis.

Contribution

It proposes SCALE, a post-retrieval audit and composition method for open-pool LoRA reuse, with LASRC for residual merging and a reliability layer for disagreement analysis.

Findings

LASRC provides directional gains under fixed retrieval.

SCALE-support offers a query-label-free reliability analysis.

Qualitative trends are consistent across different decoder-only models.

Abstract

Libraries of Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapters are becoming a practical by-product of parameter-efficient adaptation. Once such adapters accumulate, a natural question is no longer how to train one adapter for one task, but how to reuse an open pool of adapters for a new task given only a small support set. Prior work has shown that LoRA modules can be composed at the task level and dynamically selected at the instance level. However, open-pool LoRA reuse is not automatic: retrieving relevant adapters does not guarantee that their parameter updates are compatible, and composing adapters does not guarantee reliable outputs. We introduce the Sparse-Composition Agreement Layer (SCALE), a post-retrieval audit and composition framework for open-pool LoRA reuse. SCALE contains a deployable 1.0* merge path, Layer-Adaptive Sparse Residual Composition (LASRC), and a higher-cost reliability-analysis layer for multi-view disagreement. LASRC addresses merge interference by preserving a linear anchor while residualizing block-wise adapter update directions. The reliability layer treats disagreement among sparse composition views as an observable uncertainty signal and compares agreement, support-loss proxy selection, and oracle headroom under explicit path cost. In matched FLAN-T5-Large, BIG-Bench Hard (BBH), and 97-LoRA experiments, LASRC gives a directional single-view gain under fixed retrieval, while SCALE-support is reported as a query-label-free 3.0* reliability-analysis variant rather than as a calibrated or throughput-equivalent selector. Protocol-distinct BBH-8 validation shows the same qualitative trend on three decoder-only backbones. Detailed scores, paired audits, and path-cost records are reported in the experimental section.