Spectral Graph Sparsification Preserves Representation Geometry in Graph Neural Networks
Sanjukta Krishnagopal

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that spectral graph sparsification maintains the geometric structure of GNN embeddings and ensures stability in training, supported by theoretical proofs and empirical validation.
Contribution
It provides the first theoretical and empirical analysis showing spectral sparsification preserves embedding geometry and training stability in GNNs.
Findings
Spectral sparsification induces only $O(psilon)$ perturbations in polynomial graph filters and representations.
Embedding geometry, including Gram matrices and class means, remains stable under spectral sparsification.
Training dynamics on sparse graphs closely match those on dense graphs, indicating stability and robustness.
Abstract
Spectral graph sparsification is a classical tool for reducing graph complexity while preserving Laplacian quadratic forms. In graph neural networks (GNNs), sparsification is often used to accelerate computation while maintaining predictive performance. In this work, we study a complementary representation-level question: does sparsification preserve the geometry of learned embeddings? For polynomial-filter GNNs, we prove that any -spectral sparsifier induces perturbations in polynomial graph filters, multilayer hidden representations, and their Gram matrices. These guarantees imply stability of squared pairwise distances, class means, and covariance structure in embedding space. We further establish finite-time training stability: under smoothness and boundedness assumptions, gradient descent on dense and sparsified graphs produces weight trajectories whose…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
