Certified Purity for Cognitive Workflow Executors: From Static Analysis to Cryptographic Attestation
Alan L. McCann

TL;DR
This paper introduces a cryptographically certified purity architecture for cognitive workflow executors, ensuring effect-free modules through static and runtime verification, including remote attestation.
Contribution
It presents a novel architecture combining static structural constraints, cryptographic certificates, runtime gates, and remote attestation to enforce purity in cognitive workflows.
Findings
Effect-producing instructions are structurally absent in a restricted WebAssembly target.
Cryptographic certificates bind executors to their import classifications.
Runtime verification rejects uncertified executors with minimal latency.
Abstract
We present a certified purity architecture that converts governance enforcement in cognitive workflow systems from a runtime convention into a structural capability boundary. A prior three-layer governance architecture proves governance completeness, provenance completeness, and the impossibility of ungoverned effects, conditional on the pure module constraint: that step executors cannot perform effects. That constraint was enforced by module import graph analysis, which is insufficient against adversarial bypass on the BEAM virtual machine. This paper closes the gap through four mechanisms: (1) a restricted WebAssembly compilation target where effect-producing instructions are structurally absent; (2) purity certificates, cryptographically signed proofs binding executor binaries to their import classifications; (3) a runtime verification gate that rejects uncertified executors before…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
