The Outer Space Treaty Won't Save Us From Ourselves
John Barentine, Aparna Venkatesan

TL;DR
The paper critiques the limitations of the Outer Space Treaty in regulating space activities amid growing interests and advocates for legal recognition of space as an environment for sustainable stewardship.
Contribution
It highlights the need for space to be legally recognized as an environment to ensure ethical and effective regulation beyond the current weak international framework.
Findings
Current treaties rely on goodwill, which is insufficient for enforcement.
Growing interests threaten the sustainability of space activities.
Proposes legal recognition of space as an environment for better regulation.
Abstract
The rapid growth of human activities in outer space sounds urgent alarms around ethical and philosophical issues, particularly concerning space militarization. The present international legal framework governing activities in space, the Outer Space Treaty (OST), views the peaceful exploration of space for scientific research as co-equal to other 'uses' entitled to "due regard" with respect to "potentially harmful interference" on the part of other space actors. The OST is deeply aspirational but has weak enforcement mechanisms, relying at its core on the goodwill of all involved parties as the fundamental basis for accountability. But that framework now faces unsustainable pressures from both public and private interests, and current agreements like the OST may be unable to exert timely, material protections. Terrestrial frameworks of "ethics of deterrence" versus the "ethics of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
