Optimization of Weak Lensing Lightcone Simulations for Higher-Order Statistics in the LSST era
J. Mena-Fern\'andez, C. Doux, J. Harnois-D\'eraps, K. Heitmann, C. Combet, P. Larsen, N. Frontiere, A. Bera, S. Samario-Nava, L. Castiblanco, C. Uhlemann, the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration

TL;DR
This paper develops an optimized framework for generating lightcone simulations tailored for higher-order statistics analysis in Stage-IV cosmic shear data, emphasizing accuracy, resolution, and computational efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a re-optimized simulation approach with improved lightcone discretization and resolution, enhancing accuracy for higher-order statistics in LSST-like surveys.
Findings
Uniform scale factor discretization improves accuracy over redshift or comoving distance schemes.
Simulations with 2048^3 particles robustly reproduce all considered statistics.
Downsampling particle density at high redshift reduces computational load without affecting results.
Abstract
We present a framework for generating lightcone simulations tailored to the analysis of Stage-IV cosmic shear data using Higher-Order Statistics (HOS). We revisit key design choices from previous simulation campaigns and re-optimize several internal parameters, benchmarking accuracy through changes in of cosmic shear statistics under survey conditions mimicking 10 years of observations from the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We find that discretizing the lightcone uniformly in scale factor yields higher accuracy than commonly adopted schemes such as uniform spacing in redshift or comoving distance. While simulation particles (corresponding to a mass resolution of ) is sufficient to model two-point statistics up to , we observed significant instabilities on our full suite of HOS as the number…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
