Simpson's paradox explains the ubiquity of nonlinear, threshold, and complex contagions
Laurent H\'ebert-Dufresne, Antoine Allard, Jean-Gabriel Young, William H. W. Thompson, Guillaume St-Onge

TL;DR
This paper explains how Simpson's paradox can cause linear or sublinear contagion processes within groups to appear superlinear when aggregated, elucidating the widespread use of nonlinear contagion models.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of Simpson's contagion, showing how heterogeneity and correlations lead to apparent superlinear contagion effects in population data.
Findings
Global threshold dynamics can emerge from linear subgroup interactions.
Heterogeneity causes superlinear effects in aggregated data despite linear subgroup dynamics.
Simpson's paradox explains the ubiquity of nonlinear contagion models.
Abstract
Complex contagions describe systems where the probability or rate of contagious transmission is a nonlinear function of the exposure to contagious agents. These models were first studied theoretically but have since been used to capture effects such as nonconformism, social reinforcement or peer pressure in empirical data. However, recent studies have shown that local correlations (e.g., group structure or temporal burstiness) and heterogeneity (e.g., diversity of parameters or covariates) can give the illusion of nonlinear effects even when the dynamics is actually linear. We briefly review these studies to inform a new model and explanation for these effective models of complex contagions. We find global threshold dynamics and superlinear complex contagions even in populations where agents are distributed across social groups described solely by linear or even sublinear contagions.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
