Diversity in Large Language Models under Supervised Fine-Tuning
Roman Klypa, Oleksandr Cherednichenko

TL;DR
This paper investigates how supervised fine-tuning reduces diversity in large language models and introduces TOFU loss to mitigate this effect, improving output variety without sacrificing quality.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis of diversity loss in SFT and proposes a novel TOFU loss to enhance diversity while maintaining response quality.
Findings
Generation breadth narrows after SFT.
TOFU improves diversity across models and benchmarks.
TOFU preserves high response quality.
Abstract
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is essential for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with user intent, yet it is believed to suppress generative diversity. Although this reduction is frequently referenced, formal empirical testing of the phenomenon remains limited. The expressiveness of LLMs by itself was addressed by multiple prior methods. Their varying perspectives suggest that deeper investigation could yield further improvements. In this study, we attribute the decline to two primary drivers: the neglect of low-frequency patterns within fine-tuning datasets and the forgetting of preexisting knowledge. Motivated by our theoretical analysis, we develop Tempered Focal (TOFU) loss, a novel objective that addresses both stated challenges simultaneously. Our extensive evaluation confirms at scale that generation breadth narrows after SFT and strengthens the hypothesis explaining this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
