Merger remnant and eccentricity dynamics surrogates for eccentric nonspinning black hole binaries
Adhrit Ravichandran, Peter James Nee, Keefe Mitman, Tousif Islam, Scott E. Field, Vijay Varma, Michael Boyle, Andrea Ceja, Nils Deppe, Noora Ghadiri, Lawrence E. Kidder, Prayush Kumar, Marlo Morales, Jordan Moxon, Kyle C. Nelli, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Antoni Ramos-Buades

TL;DR
This paper introduces two new surrogate models trained on numerical relativity simulations to predict remnant properties and eccentricity evolution of unequal-mass, non-spinning eccentric binary black holes, aiding gravitational-wave analysis.
Contribution
The paper presents the first models for remnant properties and eccentricity dynamics specifically for eccentric, non-spinning binary black holes, trained on a comprehensive NR simulation dataset.
Findings
Models accurately predict remnant mass, spin, and recoil for eccentric binaries.
Eccentricity impacts remnant properties and recoil, with quantifiable effects.
Error estimates support reliable use in gravitational-wave data analysis.
Abstract
Accurate models of merger remnants are increasingly important for gravitational-wave science, including precision tests of gravity with ringdown, inference of black-hole populations, and modeling hierarchical mergers. For eccentric binaries, remnant mass, spin, and recoil carry nontrivial imprints of eccentricity that are both physically informative and more challenging to model, yet remain less developed than in the quasi-circular case. We present two new models trained on numerical-relativity (NR) simulations of unequal-mass, non-spinning eccentric binary black holes: NRSurE_q4NoSpin_Remnant, which predicts remnant properties, and NRSurE_q4NoSpin_Dynamics, a time-domain surrogate for the evolution of eccentricity and mean anomaly. Both models are trained on NR simulations over a three-dimensional parameter space with mass ratios , eccentricity , and mean anomaly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
