The LISA Astrophysics MBHcatalogues Project: A comparison of predictions of simulated massive black hole binaries
David Izquierdo-Villalba, Melanie Habouzit, Matteo Bonetti, Silvia Bonoli, Alessia Gualandris, Marta Volonteri, Federico Angeloni, Enrico Barausse, Aklant Bhowmick, Laura Blecha, Alexander Bonilla Rivera, Elisa Bortolas, Mesut Caliskan, Pedro R. Capelo, Ana Caramete

TL;DR
This paper compares various theoretical models and simulations to predict massive black hole merger rates for LISA, analyzing uncertainties and dependencies on model assumptions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of 20 models and simulations to estimate MBH merger rates and their uncertainties for LISA observations.
Findings
Quantifies the spread in predicted MBH merger rates.
Evaluates the impact of model assumptions like seeding and simulation resolution.
Discusses how merger rates depend on astrophysical uncertainties.
Abstract
In the hierarchical paradigm of galaxy formation, central massive black holes (MBHs) are expected to coalesce after the merger of their host galaxies. One of the main goals of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is to constrain the origin and growth of MBHs through their merger rates and mass distribution. Predicting MBH merger rates requires not only tracing their statistical population from large to small physical scales (kpc to sub-pc) but also modelling their formation, accretion, dynamics, mergers, and their galactic physical processes across cosmic time. This project is the result of a large collaborative effort undertaken by the LISA Astrophysics Working Group, bringing together its collective expertise on MBH formation, evolution, and modelling, to build a comprehensive understanding of MBH merger rates across cosmic time. The project compares various theoretical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
