Branch-Resolved Characterization of Feed-Forward Error in Dynamic Teleportation via Classical Choi Shadows

TL;DR

This paper introduces a framework for analyzing and mitigating feed-forward errors in dynamic quantum circuit teleportation, revealing branch-specific error behaviors on superconducting qubits.

Contribution

It presents a novel branch-resolved characterization method using Choi shadows and compares mitigation strategies across different hardware layouts.

Findings

PROM outperforms post-processing in high-error layouts.

Post-processing surpasses PROM in low-error layouts.

Branch-specific error analysis reveals mitigation effectiveness.

Abstract

Mid-circuit measurement and classical feed-forward are essential primitives for dynamic-circuit teleportation on superconducting quantum processors. However, the error associated with measurement-conditioned corrective operations remains poorly understood when evaluated with respect to individual measurement branches. In this paper, we present a framework for characterizing feed-forward error in dynamic circuit teleportation without losing valuable information related to its behavior across separate branches. We analyze three approaches to applying measurement-conditioned corrections: (i) physical application, (ii) post-processing adjustments, and (iii) a mitigated physical application which utilizes Bit-Flip Averaging (BFA)-based Probabilistic Readout Error Mitigation (PROM). We experimentally reconstruct branch Choi operators via an entangled reference qubit, and validate our physical-application and post-processing Choi-shadow estimators against full tomography of the branch Choi operators. We perform experiments on two physical qubit layouts which differ greatly in mid-circuit measurement readout error, and observe a reversal in the relative order in branch qualities obtained from the post-processing and PROM mitigation strategies. In one physical layout with higher measurement readout error, the operational feed-forward penalty is relatively modest (approximately 0.02-0.03) and PROM produces higher branch qualities than post-processing for every branch. In a separate layout with lower readout error, the operational feed-forward penalty increases to roughly 0.07, and post-processing exceeds PROM for all branch qualities. Our characterization framework can reveal branch-specific error structure and mitigation behavior that state-of-the-art outcome-averaged analyses fail to expose.