Gender Bias in YouTube Exposure: Allocative and Structural Inequalities in Political Information Environments
Jipeng Tan, Weifeng Zhang, Ye Wu, Jialin Guo, Yong Min

TL;DR
This study investigates gender bias in YouTube's recommendation algorithms, revealing significant allocative and structural biases that reinforce societal inequalities in political information exposure.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence of gender-based disparities in political content recommendation and introduces a simple model reproducing these biases.
Findings
Significant differences in issue distribution and ideological orientation between male and female profiles.
Distinct clustering patterns indicating structural bias in political information environments.
Exposure pathways are shaped over time by community structures and profile dynamics.
Abstract
Recommendation algorithms have become the dominant mechanism for information distribution on digital platforms, profoundly shaping personalized information consumption environments. However, gender bias, as a significant form of algorithmic discrimination, may cause users to experience unequal exposure within different political information environments. Taking YouTube as a case, we conduct a controlled social-bot field experiment, where male-coded and female-coded profiles are constructed. We track the exposure and click patterns of these bots to analyze their recommendation trajectories. We analyze the distribution of recommended content from two dimensions: allocative bias and structural bias. First, we find statistically significant differences in allocative bias across male-coded and female-coded profiles, particularly in terms of issue distribution, ideological orientation, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
