Bayesian X-Learner: Calibrated Posterior Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Heavy-Tailed Outcomes
Eichi Uehara

TL;DR
The paper introduces Bayesian X-Learner, a method for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with calibrated uncertainty and robustness to heavy-tailed outcomes, using a Bayesian approach with MCMC.
Contribution
It develops a Bayesian X-Learner that combines cross-fitted pseudo-outcomes with a full MCMC posterior, addressing heterogeneity, calibration, and heavy tails simultaneously.
Findings
Achieves competitive PEHE on IHDP benchmark.
Recovers RMSE ≈ 0.13 on contaminated whale DGPs.
Provides tight credible intervals with proper coverage.
Abstract
Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation in practice demands three properties simultaneously: heterogeneous effects , calibrated uncertainty over them, and robustness to the heavy tails that contaminate real outcome data. Meta-learners (K\"unzel et al., 2019) give (i); causal forests and BART give (i)-(ii) with Gaussian-tail assumptions; no widely used tool gives all three. We present Bayesian X-Learner, an X-Learner built on cross-fitted doubly robust pseudo-outcomes (Kennedy, 2020) with a full MCMC posterior over via a Welsch redescending pseudo-likelihood. On Hill's IHDP benchmark the default configuration attains mean on 5 replications (lowest mean; differences from S-/T-/X-learners, full-config Causal BART, and a causal forest baseline are not significant at , and rank ordering is unstable at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
