Strongly Refuting Random CSP without Literals
Siu On Chan, Tommaso d'Orsi, Jeff Xu

TL;DR
This paper establishes that t-wise independence, rather than t-wise uniformity, is the key condition for the hardness of refuting random CSPs using the sum-of-squares algorithm, extending previous results.
Contribution
It proves that t-wise independence is necessary and sufficient for SoS lower bounds in general random k-CSPs, removing the need for literals and Boolean domain assumptions.
Findings
t-wise independence characterizes SoS hardness for general random k-CSPs
Extended the three-way tradeoff to non-Boolean domains and non-literal CSPs
Developed new Kikuchi matrices and a spectral refutation algorithm
Abstract
Under what condition is a random constraint satisfaction problem hard to refute by the sum-of-squares (SoS) algorithm? A sufficient condition is t-wise uniformity, that is, each constraint has a t-wise uniform distribution of satisfying assignments, as shown by the lower bounds of Kothari, Mori, O'Donnell, and Witmer (STOC 2017). This condition is also necessary for random CSPs given by a predicate and uniformly random literals, due to the constant-degree SoS refutation of Allen, O'Donnell, and Witmer (FOCS 2015). For higher degree, Raghavendra, Rao, and Schramm (STOC 2017) gave a refutation for Boolean random CSPs with uniformly random literals, matching the lower bounds optimally in terms of the three-way tradeoff between constraint density, SoS degree, and strength of refutation. Two long-standing open problems are to find a more general sufficient condition for SoS lower bounds,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
