Evaluating Epistemic Guardrails in AI Reading Assistants: A Behavioral Audit of a Minimal Prototype
Matthew Christian Agustin

TL;DR
This study evaluates how AI reading assistants support or displace human interpretive work, using a behavioral protocol to analyze their stability and boundary management during complex reading tasks.
Contribution
It introduces a protocol for empirically assessing epistemic guardrails in AI reading assistants as observable interactional behaviors.
Findings
Strong baseline stability observed in AI support behaviors.
Measurable interpretive strain occurs under inquiry and boundary stress.
Late-stage stabilization suggests adaptive guardrail responses.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) reading assistants are increasingly used in settings that require interpretation rather than simple retrieval. In these contexts, the central risk is not only error or unsafe output, but interpretive displacement: the transfer of meaning-making work from reader to system. This paper examines that problem through the concept of epistemic guardrails, defined here as constraints on how an artificial intelligence (AI) system participates in reading and interpretation. Using TextWalk, a minimal reading-support prototype designed as a co-reader rather than an answer-provider, the study applies a fixed ten-prompt protocol to twelve analytical texts spanning four categories of argumentative prose. The protocol escalates from baseline reading support to interpretive inquiry, boundary stress, and explicit shortcut pressure, enabling guardrails to be examined as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
