Truthful-in-Expectation Mechanisms for MMS Approximation
Moshe Babaioff, Uriel Feige, Noam Manaker Morag

TL;DR
This paper introduces randomized truthful-in-expectation mechanisms for fair allocation of indivisible goods, achieving near-optimal MMS guarantees and extending to the truncated proportional share, with improved bounds using minimal additional information.
Contribution
It presents new ordinal and cardinal TIE mechanisms that improve MMS approximation guarantees, including a nearly optimal ordinal mechanism and a two-agent mechanism with a 2/3 guarantee.
Findings
Ordinal TIE mechanism guarantees 1/(H_n+2)-MMS ex-post.
Additional cardinal info improves guarantee to Ω(1/ log log n).
Two-agent TIE mechanism guarantees 2/3-MMS ex-post.
Abstract
We study fair allocation of indivisible goods among strategic agents with additive valuations. Motivated by impossibility results for deterministic truthful mechanisms, we focus on randomized mechanisms that are \emph{Truthful-in-Expectation (TIE)}. From a fairness perspective, we seek to guarantee every agent a large fraction of their \emph{Maximin Share (MMS)} ex-post. Among other results, Bu~and~Tao~[FOCS 2025] presented a TIE mechanism that guarantees -MMS ex-post. First, we present an ordinal TIE mechanism that guarantees -MMS ex-post, where is the -th harmonic number (). This is nearly best possible for ordinal mechanisms, as even non-truthful ordinal allocation algorithms cannot obtain an approximation better than . We then show that with just a small amount of additional cardinal information, the ex-post…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
