MISES: Minimal Information Sufficiency for Effective Service
Joss Armstrong

TL;DR
This paper analyzes category-based resource allocation mechanisms, establishing bounds on welfare and detection performance, and discusses the trade-offs in choosing category granularity for effective service coordination.
Contribution
It provides theoretical bounds and insights on the trade-offs in category-based mechanisms, including the sufficiency of demand-derived categories and entropy bounds for coordination.
Findings
Welfare gap bounds are tightly linked to within-category variance epsilon.
Demand-derived categories minimize welfare loss and misreporting incentives.
Finer categories improve welfare but worsen detection performance.
Abstract
Category-based coordination mechanisms allocate resources by mapping a declared service category to a fixed resource profile, without observing individual demand types. We establish three results for this class of mechanisms. First, the relative welfare gap Delta satisfies a tight two-sided bound in terms of the aggregate within-category allocation variance epsilon: (alpha/2W*)epsilon <= Delta <= (beta/2W*)epsilon. Second, the expected misreporting gain is bounded by the same epsilon without assumptions on agent strategy; demand-derived categories minimise both welfare loss and misreporting incentive simultaneously. Third, aggregate outcome metrics strictly dominate per-agent metrics for service-level detection under a homogeneity condition, for all parameter values, with a finite-sample power gap of O(1/m). At any fixed K, the demand-derived category label is the sufficient statistic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
