Euclid preparation. Refining input galaxy shape distributions for shear calibration simulations

TL;DR

This paper improves shear bias calibration for Euclid by refining galaxy shape distributions using real data, leading to more accurate weak lensing measurements essential for precision cosmology.

Contribution

It introduces a method to incorporate real Euclid galaxy morphologies into simulations, reducing shear bias uncertainties for Euclid's cosmological analyses.

Findings

Updated galaxy morphologies cause percent-level changes in shear bias.

The approach meets Euclid's requirements for the first data release.

Simulations with refined morphologies improve bias calibration accuracy.

Abstract

The Euclid Wide Survey (EWS) will cover the majority of the extragalactic sky with a resolution similar to the Hubble Space Telescope. This unprecedented data set will introduce a new era of precision cosmology. However, systematic effects need to be controlled better than ever. One of the sources of systematic uncertainties in weak gravitational lensing are biases introduced during the shear measurement. Determining these biases precisely allows the calibration of cosmological measurements to within Euclid's required accuracy. The simulations that are used to determine such biases, need to resemble the real observations. In this work, we aim to learn distributions of galaxy shape parameters from real Euclid data and use the new information to augment the morphological information in the Flagship galaxy mock catalogue. The morphology is extracted using single and double-S\'ersic model fits to the real data, for which we use SourceXtractor++. We train our pipeline on deep Euclid observations of a field with rich auxiliary data and then use it to simulate EWS-like data. In these simulations we compare the multiplicative bias between the morphology from the Flagship catalogue, the trained single-S\'ersic morphology, and the trained double-S\'ersic morphology. We find that the image simulations with the updated morphology result in a percent-level change in the multiplicative shear bias compared to the original morphology from Flagship. This bias exceeds Euclid's tight error budget by a factor of five and underlines the need for this work. Furthermore, we study the sensitivity of the multiplicative bias to key morphological parameters and show that our approach satisfies the requirements for the cosmology analysis with the first data release of Euclid.