A Comparative study on THz Communication Systems: Photonics versus Electronics Approaches
Talha Rahman, Murat Uysal

TL;DR
This paper compares electronics- and photonics-based THz communication systems, analyzing hardware architectures, performance, and impairments to guide future 6G technology development.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review and modeling of THz links, highlighting differences and trade-offs between electronics and photonics approaches.
Findings
Electronics-based THz systems suffer from phase noise and nonlinearities.
Photonics-based systems offer tunability but face laser and thermal noise.
Performance analysis shows how impairments impact link reliability.
Abstract
Terahertz (THz) communication has emerged as a key enabler for sixth-generation (6G) networks, offering ultrawide bandwidths to support data-intensive applications such as holographic telepresence and immersive extended reality. Recent advances have enabled both electronics-based and photonics-based THz front-ends, each with distinct advantages and hardware limitations. While electronics-based solutions leverage mature semiconductor platforms, they suffer from amplified oscillator phase noise, frequency offsets, and nonlinearities introduced by multiplier and amplifier chains. Photonics-based systems, in turn, enable highly tunable and spectrally pure carriers but are subject to laser intensity noise, amplified spontaneous emission, shot noise in photomixers, and thermal noise in RF mixers. This article provides a comprehensive review of experimental demonstrations in electronics-,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
