Analytical Modeling of Far-Field Wavefront Error with Beam-Waist and Lateral-Shift Effects in Spaceborne Laser Interferometry
Ya-Zheng Tao, Rui-Hong Gao, Guangzhou Xu, Yue-Liang Wu

TL;DR
This paper extends an analytical model for far-field wavefront error in spaceborne laser interferometry by including beam-waist and lateral-shift effects, aiding in beam optimization and alignment in gravitational-wave missions.
Contribution
The authors incorporate practical initial-condition parameters into the Nijboer--Zernike model, analyzing their impact on wavefront error and alignment tolerances in space laser links.
Findings
Reducing the beam-waist-to-aperture ratio q decreases far-field WFE by up to 14%.
Lateral spot shift contributes significantly to phase coupling, affecting TTL requirements.
Negligible impact of spot-shift--aberration coupling terms simplifies tolerance estimation.
Abstract
The coupling between far-field wavefront error (WFE) and laser pointing jitter is an important source of tilt-to-length (TTL) noise in spaceborne laser interferometric links. We extend the Nijboer--Zernike analytical model for far-field WFE of truncated Gaussian beams by incorporating two practical initial-condition parameters, the beam-waist-to-aperture ratio and the normalized lateral spot-shift ratio , to account for realistic beam truncation and alignment conditions. Based on this model, we analyze the influence of on far-field WFE in addition to the conventional received-power trade-off, showing that decreasing from 1 to 0.9 and from 0.9 to 0.8 reduces the mean far-field WFE by approximately 10\% and 14\%, respectively, in Monte Carlo simulations of random initial aberrations. We also derive the direct contribution of lateral spot shift and its coupling with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
