Mixture of Experts Framework in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Atomistic Simulations
Gabriel de Miranda Nascimento, Marc L. Descoteaux, Laura Zichi, Chuin Wei Tan, William C. Witt, Nicola Molinari, Sriteja Mantha, Daniil Kitchaev, Mordechai Kornbluth, Karim Gadelrab, Charles Tuffile, and Boris Kozinsky

TL;DR
This paper introduces a multifidelity mixture-of-experts framework for machine learning interatomic potentials, partitioning simulation domains to improve efficiency while maintaining accuracy and physical consistency.
Contribution
It proposes a novel co-training strategy with agreement constraints to address interface issues in static domain decomposition for atomistic simulations.
Findings
Maintains energy conservation and mechanical response accuracy.
Achieves over twice the computational speed compared to full high-fidelity models.
Validates effectiveness on a Pt+CO catalytic system.
Abstract
First-principles atomistic simulations are essential for understanding complex material phenomena but are fundamentally limited by their computational cost. While Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) have drastically improved cost for a given accuracy, their inference cost remains a bottleneck for massive systems or long timescales. To address this, we introduce a multifidelity "Mixture-of-Experts" framework based on the E(3)-equivariant Allegro architecture. Our method spatially partitions the simulation domain into a chemically complex region (e.g., reactive interfaces) and a simple region (e.g., bulk lattice), assigning models of varying capacity to each. Among the challenges in such static domain decomposition, the mechanical mismatch between models at the interface is particularly critical, as it can generate artificial stress fields and instability. We address this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
