Explainable AI for Jet Tagging: A Comparative Study of GNNExplainer, GNNShap, and GradCAM for Jet Tagging in the Lund Jet Plane
Pahal D. Patel, Sanmay Ganguly

TL;DR
This study compares perturbation, Shapley-value, and gradient-based explainability methods for graph neural networks in jet tagging, introducing a physics-informed evaluation framework and analyzing their correlation with known QCD features.
Contribution
It adapts explainability methods to LundNet's graph representation, introduces a physics-informed evaluation, and assesses explanation quality across different regimes.
Findings
Explanation methods correlate with classical jet substructure observables.
Explanation focus shifts between non-perturbative and perturbative regimes.
The neural network learns aspects of jet-substructure moments.
Abstract
Graph neural networks such as ParticleNet and transformer based networks on point clouds such as ParticleTransformer achieve state-of-the-art performance on jet tagging benchmarks at the Large Hadron Collider, yet the physical reasoning behind their predictions remains opaque. We present different methods, i.e. perturbation-based (GNNExplainer), Shapley-value-based (GNNShap), and gradient-based (GRADCam); adapted to operate on LundNet's Lund-plane graph representation. Leveraging the fact that each node in the Lund plane corresponds to a physically meaningful parton splitting, we construct Monte Carlo truth explanation masks and introduce a physics-informed evaluation framework that goes beyond standard fidelity metrics. We perform the analysis in three transverse-momentum bins (, , and the inclusive region GeV), revealing how…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
