The Short- and Long-Term Impacts of Expanding Public Education for Disabled Students
Laura Caron

TL;DR
This study examines the extensive impacts of U.S. public education mandates for disabled students from 1949 to 1980, showing significant long-term benefits in education, employment, and family outcomes.
Contribution
It provides new empirical evidence on the broad, long-term effects of expanding educational access for disabled students using historical data and difference-in-difference analysis.
Findings
Increased services and preschool enrollments for disabled students.
Disabled individuals experienced more education and employment in adulthood.
Positive spillovers for non-disabled individuals and economic benefits for society.
Abstract
Between 1949 and 1980, every U.S. state mandated public schools to provide educational services for disabled students. This is one of the largest education reforms in U.S. history, but little is known about its impacts. Given scarce data in this period, I compile survey and administrative datasets and set up a difference-in-difference design using variation in the mandates' timing. I show that the mandates increased both services for disabled students and preschool enrollments. In adulthood, disabled individuals below school age at a mandate's implementation became about 20% less likely to have no education, attained up to 0.23 more years of education, and were more likely to have worked. Although this policy could have taken away resources from non-disabled students, in fact, education and employment also increased for non-disabled individuals. These effects align with evidence that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
