From Citation Selection to Citation Absorption: A Measurement Framework for Generative Engine Optimization Across AI Search Platforms
Zhang Kai, He Xinyue, Yao Jingang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-stage measurement framework for evaluating how generative search engines select and absorb citations, analyzing a large dataset across multiple platforms to understand citation influence and absorption.
Contribution
It proposes a novel framework for measuring citation selection and absorption in generative engines, supported by extensive dataset analysis and insights into citation influence.
Findings
Perplexity and Google cite more sources on average.
ChatGPT cites fewer sources but has higher citation influence.
High-influence pages are longer, structured, and contain richer evidence.
Abstract
Generative search engines increasingly determine whether online information is merely discoverable, cited as a source, or actually absorbed into generated answers. This paper proposes a two-stage measurement framework for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): citation selection, where a platform triggers search and chooses sources, and citation absorption, where a cited page contributes language, evidence, structure, or factual support to the final answer. We analyze the public geo-citation-lab dataset covering 602 controlled prompts across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview/Gemini, and Perplexity; 21,143 valid search-layer citations; 23,745 citation-level feature records; 18,151 successfully fetched pages; and 72 extracted features. The central descriptive finding is that citation breadth and citation depth diverge. Perplexity and Google cite more sources on average, while ChatGPT cites fewer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
