Orchestration paradoxes in national quantum computing innovation ecosystems

TL;DR

This paper explores the paradoxical tensions faced by orchestrators in national quantum computing ecosystems, highlighting the importance of recognizing and balancing these tensions for effective ecosystem management.

Contribution

It provides an empirical analysis of paradoxical tensions in a government-led national QCI ecosystem, offering new insights into ecosystem orchestration challenges.

Findings

Identified core paradoxical tensions in the Finnish QCI ecosystem.

Showed how these tensions challenge effective orchestration.

Discussed strategies for recognizing and balancing tensions.

Abstract

Effective orchestration is a critical driver of success in quantum computing innovation (QCI) ecosystems. Heterogeneous actor goals, roles, and power relations, however, produce tensions that confront orchestrators with paradoxical situations in which they must navigate trade-offs between competing demands. To orchestrate an ecosystem effectively, these tensions must be recognized and balanced rather than eliminated. Prior research has largely overlooked the role of paradoxes in ecosystem orchestration or has focused mainly on interfirm relationships. This study addresses this gap by examining a government led national QCI ecosystem that includes firms, research organizations, funding bodies, and governmental actors. Using an explorative case study with 15 informants from the Finnish QCI ecosystem and drawing on paradox theory as an analytical lens, we identify core paradoxical tensions and show how they challenge ecosystem orchestration. We contribute nuanced insights into the origins and dynamics of paradoxical tensions and discuss the implications for orchestrating multi-actor ecosystems.