One-shot emergency psychiatric triage across 15 frontier AI chatbots
Veith Weilnhammer, Lennart Luettgau, Christopher Summerfield, Viknesh Sounderajah, Elise Wilkinson, Virginia Corno, Matthew M Nour

TL;DR
This study evaluates 15 frontier AI chatbots' ability to perform psychiatric triage from single-message disclosures, revealing high accuracy for emergencies but significant over-triage at lower risk levels.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of AI chatbots' performance in psychiatric triage, highlighting strengths in emergency recognition and areas needing improvement.
Findings
Emergency under-triage occurred in 5.6% of level D cases.
Average accuracy ranged from 42.0% to 71.8%.
Chatbots showed near-zero error rates for emergencies but over-triaged lower risks.
Abstract
AI chatbots are increasingly used for health advice, but their performance in psychiatric triage remains undercharacterized. Psychiatric triage is particularly challenging because urgency must often be inferred from thoughts, behavior, and context rather than from objective findings. We evaluated the performance of 15 frontier AI chatbots on psychiatric triage from realistic single-message disclosures using 112 clinical vignettes, each paired with 1 of 4 original benchmark triage labels: A, routine; B, assessment within 1 week; C, assessment within 24 to 48 hours; and D, emergency care now. Vignettes covered 9 psychiatric presentation clusters and 9 focal risk dimensions, organized into 28 presentation-by-risk groups. Each group contributed 4 distinct vignettes, with 1 vignette at each triage level. Each vignette was rendered as a realistic human-authored conversational query, and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
