Mitigating Shared-Private Branch Imbalance via Dual-Branch Rebalancing for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
Chunlei Meng, Jiabin Luo, Pengbin Feng, Zhenglin Yan, Chengyin Hu, Zhongxue Gan, Chun Ouyang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Dual-Branch Rebalancing Framework (DBR) that enhances multimodal sentiment analysis by reducing branch imbalance through specialized modules, leading to improved performance on multiple datasets.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel DBR framework with modules for disentangling temporal-structural features and preserving modality-specific patterns, addressing branch imbalance in multimodal sentiment analysis.
Findings
DBR outperforms baseline methods on CMU-MOSI, CMU-MOSEI, and MIntRec datasets.
The framework effectively mitigates branch imbalance, improving sentiment prediction accuracy.
Analyses confirm that coordinated branch rebalancing enhances model robustness.
Abstract
Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) requires integrating language, acoustic, and visual signals without sacrificing modality-specific sentiment evidence. Existing methods mainly improve either shared-private decomposition or cross-modal interaction. Although effective, both ultimately depend on how shared and modality-specific evidence is organized before prediction. We observe that, under standard shared-private pipelines, modality heterogeneity often induces a branch-imbalance process: dominant shared patterns accumulate in the shared branch, yielding redundant and modality-biased evidence, while repeated interaction and rigid alignment gradually leak shared information into modality-specific channels and weaken discriminative private representations. As a result, the complementarity between shared and private representations is reduced, limiting robust sentiment reasoning. To address…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
