SCOPE:Planning for Hybrid Querying over Clinical Trial Data
Suparno Roy Chowdhury, Manan Roy Choudhury, Tejas Anvekar, Muhammad Ali Khan, Kaneez Zahra Rubab Khakwani, Mohamad Bassam Sonbol, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Vivek Gupta

TL;DR
This paper introduces SCOPE, a multi-LLM planning framework that improves reasoning over clinical trial data by explicitly decomposing tasks, leading to better accuracy and efficiency in answering complex questions.
Contribution
The paper presents SCOPE, a novel multi-LLM planner-based approach that explicitly decomposes clinical trial reasoning tasks, outperforming existing methods in accuracy and efficiency.
Findings
Explicit multi-LLM planning improves reasoning accuracy.
SCOPE outperforms zero-shot, few-shot, and other baseline methods.
Hybrid planning offers a better accuracy-efficiency tradeoff.
Abstract
We study clinical trial table reasoning, where answers are not directly stored in visible cells but must be reasoned from semantic understanding through normalization, classification, extraction, or lightweight domain reasoning. Motivated by the observation that current LLM approaches often suffer from "bad reasoning" under implicit planning assumptions, we focus on settings in which the model must recover implicit attributes such as therapy type, added agents, endpoint roles, or follow-up status from partially observed clinical-trial tables. We propose SCOPE (Structured Clinical hybrid Planning for Evidence retrieval in clinical trials), a multi-LLM planner-based framework that decomposes the task into row selection, structured planning, and execution. The planner makes the source field, reasoning rules, and output constraints explicit before answer generation, reducing ambiguity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
