Waning Immunity Fails to Restore a Positive Epidemic Threshold on Power-Law Networks
Zihao He, Souvik Dhara, Debankur Mukherjee

TL;DR
This paper proves that waning immunity does not create a positive epidemic threshold on power-law networks, showing the SIRS process can also sustain long-term infections.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the epidemic threshold remains zero for the SIRS process on power-law networks, contradicting previous conjectures.
Findings
The epidemic persists for exponentially long times in the SIRS model on power-law networks.
A novel 'hierarchical star' structure sustains infection long-term.
The threshold remains zero despite waning immunity.
Abstract
In a seminal work, Chatterjee and Durrett (2009) established that for the SIS epidemic process on random graphs with power-law degree distributions, the infection survives for an exponentially long time (in the network size) for any fixed, positive infection rate. Equivalently, the critical infection rate separating polynomial and exponential survival regimes is zero. In contrast, a substantial body of work in the physics literature conjectures, based primarily on numerical evidence and heuristic mean-field arguments, that introducing waning immunity (as in the SIRS process) yields a strictly positive critical infection rate on random graphs with power-law degrees; see, e.g., Pastor-Satorras et al. (2015), Ferreira et al. (2016), Silva et al. (2022). In particular, below this threshold, the epidemic is expected to persist only for a polynomial duration. A recent work by Friedrich et…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
