Errors that matter: Uncertainty-aware universal machine-learning potentials calibrated on experiments
Matthias Kellner, Teitur Hansen, Thomas Bligaard, Karsten Wedel Jacobsen, Michele Ceriotti

TL;DR
This paper develops an ensemble of machine-learning potentials calibrated with experimental data to improve the reliability and accuracy of atomic-scale simulations across various conditions.
Contribution
It introduces PET-UAFD, an ensemble method calibrated on experiments, and PET-EXP, a protocol for efficient uncertainty estimation against experimental data.
Findings
PET-UAFD achieves accuracy comparable to electronic-structure references against experiments.
The ensemble spread effectively assesses the reliability of predictions.
PET-EXP provides accurate uncertainty estimates with minimal additional computational cost.
Abstract
Machine-learning models of atomic-scale interactions achieve the accuracy of the quantum mechanical calculations on which they are trained, but at a dramatically lower computational cost. Their predictions can be made trustworthy by uncertainty quantification techniques that estimate the residual error relative to their reference. These errors, however, do not include uncertainty contributions from the approximations inherent in the electronic structure calculations, which are often the main source of discrepancy with empirical observations. We construct an ensemble of ML potentials trained on multiple electronic-structure references and calibrate it against experimental data on cohesive energies, atomization energies, lattice constants and bulk moduli of simple materials and molecules, similar to the uncertainty-aware functional distribution approach. The resulting ensemble of models,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
