GoAT-X: A Graph of Auditing Thoughts for Securing Token Transactions in Cross-Chain Contracts
Zijun Feng, Yuming Feng, Yu Wang, Weizhe Zhang, Yuhong Nan, Yuang Liu, Zibin Zheng

TL;DR
GoAT-X introduces a systematic, graph-based framework for auditing cross-chain smart contracts, significantly improving detection of vulnerabilities over existing heuristic and LLM-based methods.
Contribution
It presents a novel Graph of Auditing Thoughts framework that enhances semantic reasoning and vulnerability detection in cross-chain contract security audits.
Findings
Achieves 92% recall on audit points
Covers 95% of vulnerable projects
Identifies 117 confirmed risks in the wild
Abstract
Cross-chain bridges, the critical infrastructure of the multi-chain ecosystem, have become a primary target for attackers, resulting in over $2.8 billion in losses due to subtle implementation flaws. Existing defenses, such as bytecode-level static analysis, are ill-equipped to handle the semantic complexity of cross-chain interactions, while LLM-based approaches, which can understand source code, struggle with hallucinatory reasoning over complex, multi-contract dependencies. In this paper, we propose GoAT-X, a framework that shifts automated cross-chain smart contract codebases auditing from heuristic pattern matching toward systematic first-principles verification. GoAT-X structures the audit process as a Graph of Auditing Thoughts, explicitly mirroring how human experts decompose, reason about, and validate security logic. By anchoring LLM reasoning in statically extracted data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
