Interfacial breathing as a dynamic failure law in all-solid-state batteries: amplitude, phase lag and dual-timescale memory as design principles
Changdeuck Bae

TL;DR
This paper investigates the failure mechanisms in all-solid-state batteries, focusing on interfacial breathing and reactive memory, and proposes design principles to mitigate these effects for improved performance.
Contribution
It introduces a coupled model of interfacial breathing and reactive memory, identifying pressure as a control parameter and providing a regime map for battery stability.
Findings
Higher stack pressure suppresses breathing fluctuations.
Reactive memory remains largely unaffected by pressure.
Energy-density ranking changes with C rate due to interfacial effects.
Abstract
All-solid-state batteries fail not only by bulk transport limits, but by a reactive interface that evolves during cycling. We show that degradation is governed by two coupled processes: interfacial breathing, the cycle-scale oscillation of lithium contact, and reactive memory, the slow accumulation of electrolyte decomposition. Four descriptors capture breathing, together with a memory metric based on decomposed interphase thickness. A reduced electrochemical benchmark shows that ionic conductivity has little effect on mean discharge voltage, whereas cathode electrolyte interphase resistance causes major voltage and energy losses. A phase-field model of a sulfide-based cell shows that higher stack pressure strongly suppresses breathing-related fluctuations, but leaves reactive memory nearly unchanged. Thus, pressure controls breathing, not memory. The resulting regime map identifies…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
