TL;DR
QED is an open-source multi-agent system designed to address key failure modes in AI-generated mathematical proofs, successfully producing original proofs for open problems in analysis and PDEs.
Contribution
The paper introduces QED, a multi-agent proof system that systematically tackles failure modes in AI proof generation, achieving verified original proofs for research-level problems.
Findings
QED produced correct proofs for three out of five open problems.
The system addresses seven identified failure modes in proof generation.
QED's architecture led to verified, nontrivial proofs by domain experts.
Abstract
We explore a central question in AI for mathematics: can AI systems produce original, nontrivial proofs for open research problems? Despite strong benchmark performance, producing genuinely novel proofs remains an outstanding challenge for LLMs. Through systematic experiments with frontier LLMs on research-level proof tasks, we identify seven failure modes that prevent reliable proof generation, including context contamination, citation hallucination, hand-waving on key steps and misallocation of proof effort, unstable proof plans, unfocused verification, problem modification and single-model bottleneck. We argue that the gap between benchmark success and research-level proving is primarily one of system design, due to those failure modes. We present QED, an open-source multi-agent proof system in which each architectural decision directly addresses a specific failure mode. Evaluated on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
